Deceit and Misrepresentation Claims

Claims involving deceit or misrepresentation strike at the very heart of trust in business and personal dealings. An allegation that a false statement induced someone to enter a contract can lead to significant financial liability, contractual disputes, and severe reputational damage. Whether you are bringing a claim or defending against one, these cases are legally complex and fact-sensitive. Success requires a robust legal strategy and a meticulous approach to evidence. Securing expert legal representation is the most important step you can take to protect your position.

At Central Chambers Law, our senior legal consultants are experts in navigating the complexities of civil litigation, including claims for deceit and misrepresentation. We understand the fine legal distinctions and the commercial realities at play. Our function is to provide clear, authoritative advice and to build a powerful, evidence-based case designed to achieve the best possible outcome for you.

Understanding Deceit and Misrepresentation

In English contract law, a misrepresentation is a false statement of fact made by one party that induces another party to enter into a contract. When this occurs, the contract may become voidable, and the wronged party may be entitled to a remedy.

The law distinguishes between different types of misrepresentation based on the state of mind of the person making the statement. A claim for "deceit" is the most serious, as it involves an allegation of fraud.

The main categories are:

• Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Deceit): This occurs when a false statement is made knowingly, without belief in its truth, or recklessly as to whether it is true or false. This is the tort of deceit.
• Negligent Misrepresentation: This occurs when a statement is made carelessly or without reasonable grounds for believing it to be true. This can be a claim under common law or under the Misrepresentation Act 1967.
• Innocent Misrepresentation: This is a false statement made by someone who had reasonable grounds to believe it was true at the time it was made.

Proving the Claim

To succeed in a misrepresentation claim, a claimant must generally prove several key elements:

1. A False Statement of Fact: This must be a statement of fact, not an opinion or a statement of future intention. Silence does not usually count, unless there is a duty to disclose information.
2. The Statement was Made by the Defendant: The claimant must prove the defendant made the statement.
3. Inducement: The claimant must show that the false statement was a material reason they entered into the contract. It does not have to be the sole reason, but it must have played a real and substantial part in their decision-making.

For a claim of deceit, the claimant has the additional, higher burden of proving that the defendant acted dishonestly.

Remedies and Defences

The legal remedies available depend on the type of misrepresentation proven.

Potential Remedies

• Rescission: This is the primary remedy. It involves setting the contract aside and restoring both parties to the position they were in before the contract was made. Rescission is an equitable remedy and is granted at the court's discretion.
• Damages: This is financial compensation for losses suffered as a result of the misrepresentation. The way damages are calculated is more generous for fraudulent misrepresentation (deceit) than for negligent or innocent misrepresentation. For deceit, a claimant can recover all losses flowing directly from the transaction.

Potential Defences

• The Statement was True: The most straightforward defence is to prove the statement was factually correct.
• The Statement was Opinion: Arguing that the statement was a genuinely held opinion, not a statement of fact.
• No Inducement: Demonstrating that the claimant did not rely on the statement when entering the contract, perhaps because they conducted their own investigations or knew the statement was untrue.
• Lapse of Time: The right to rescind a contract can be lost if too much time has passed since the misrepresentation was discovered.

Why Central Chambers Law Provides the Definitive Representation

Successfully litigating a deceit or misrepresentation claim requires a legal team that can forensically analyse evidence, understand commercial context, and present a clear, persuasive case.

Clients trust Central Chambers Law because we provide a strategic, commercially astute, and tenacious litigation service. Our reputation is built on our meticulous preparation and our ability to master the factual detail that wins cases. Our approach involves:

• Immediate, Authoritative Advice: We provide an early and clear assessment of your legal position, outlining the strengths, weaknesses, and strategic options for your case.
• Forensic Case Building: We leave no stone unturned, meticulously reviewing contracts, correspondence, and all background evidence to build a comprehensive and powerful narrative.
• Strategic Application of the Law: Our team has a deep understanding of contract law and the tort of deceit, enabling us to apply the correct legal principles to the facts of your case with precision.
• Powerful Advocacy and Negotiation: Our senior advocates are skilled negotiators and formidable trial lawyers. We have the experience to fight your corner, whether seeking a favourable settlement through mediation or litigating decisively in court.

Our focused expertise means we are perfectly equipped to provide the intelligent and robust representation needed to navigate these complex disputes and protect your financial interests.

Secure Your Position with Immediate Expert Advice

If you believe you have been the victim of misrepresentation, or if you are facing such an allegation, you are involved in a serious legal dispute. The financial and reputational stakes are high, and swift, expert advice is essential.

Contact our expert litigation solicitors immediately for an urgent and confidential consultation. Taking decisive action is the first step towards achieving a successful resolution.

‍