Handling Stolen Goods

An accusation of handling stolen goods is a serious offence that the law treats with the same gravity as the original theft. It is not a lesser charge. A conviction can lead to a significant prison sentence and a criminal record that creates long-term barriers to employment and travel. The central issue in these cases is often your state of mind—what you knew or believed about the goods. Defending against such a charge requires a legal team with the expertise to challenge the prosecution’s interpretation of your actions and intentions.

At Central Chambers Law, our senior legal consultants are experts in defending against all theft-related offences. We understand that innocent people can easily get caught up in these situations, perhaps by buying an item in good faith or being unaware of its origins. Our role is to provide a powerful, strategic defence that scrutinises every aspect of the evidence. We are not general criminal lawyers; we are specialists who handle these specific cases every day, which gives us an unmatched understanding of how to protect our clients.

Understanding the Offence: What is "Handling"?

The offence of handling stolen goods is defined by Section 22 of the Theft Act 1968. A person is guilty if, otherwise than in the course of stealing, they dishonestly receive the goods, or dishonestly undertake or assist in their retention, removal, disposal, or realisation by or for the benefit of another person.

This broad definition covers a wide range of activities, including:

• Receiving: Knowingly taking possession of stolen items.
• Storing: Keeping stolen goods for someone else.
• Selling: Acting as a middleman to sell items you know or believe are stolen.
• Arranging a Sale: Helping someone else to dispose of stolen property.

The crucial elements that the prosecution must prove are:

1. The goods were in fact stolen.
2. You undertook one of the actions listed above.
3. You acted dishonestly.
4. You knew or believed the goods were stolen.

"Knowledge or Belief": The Key Element

The prosecution's case rests on proving your state of mind. It is not enough for them to show you were suspicious; they must prove that you either knew the goods were stolen or held a firm belief that they were. A mere suspicion is not sufficient for a conviction. This is often the most contentious point in a handling stolen goods case and where a specialist defence is most critical.

How the Prosecution Builds Its Case

To prove your knowledge and dishonesty, the police and Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) will build a case from circumstantial evidence. Our expertise is crucial for dismantling the narrative they create.

Common evidence in handling cases includes:

• The Price of the Goods: If you bought an item for a price far below its legitimate market value, this will be used to argue you must have known it was stolen.
• The Circumstances of the Sale: Buying goods "from the back of a lorry," in a pub, or from an unofficial seller can be used to suggest knowledge.
• Attempts to Conceal: Evidence that you tried to hide the goods or remove identifying marks will be presented as proof of guilt.
• Possession: Simply being found with recently stolen goods can be used as circumstantial evidence that you were involved in handling them.
• Your Account: What you say to the police when questioned is vital. It is essential to have expert legal advice before any interview.

Why Central Chambers Law Provides the Strongest Defence

When your state of mind is the central issue, you need a legal team with the skill to challenge the prosecution’s assumptions. A general criminal lawyer may not have the focused experience to effectively argue these nuanced points.

Clients trust Central Chambers Law because we are masters of this legal field. Our reputation is built on our ability to meticulously deconstruct the prosecution's arguments. Our strategic approach involves:

• Challenging "Knowledge or Belief": This is the heart of our defence. We build a strong case to show that you acted in good faith. Did you have a credible reason to believe the purchase was legitimate? Were you duped by a dishonest seller? We present your side of the story effectively.
• Proving Honest Conduct: We gather evidence to demonstrate that your actions were not dishonest. For example, by showing you made reasonable enquiries about the item's origin.
• Instructing Valuation Experts: If the prosecution claims you bought an item too cheaply, we can instruct our own experts to provide a realistic market valuation, challenging the basis of their argument.
• Scrutinising Police Conduct: We review the entire investigation for any procedural flaws. An unlawful search or improper questioning can lead to key evidence being ruled inadmissible by the court.

Our focused expertise enables us to identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s case that others might miss, providing you with the most formidable defence possible.

Penalties and the Legal Process

Handling stolen goods is an "either way" offence, meaning it can be heard in the Magistrates' Court or the Crown Court, depending on the value of the goods and the overall seriousness.

• The maximum sentence upon conviction in the Crown Court is 14 years' imprisonment.

The sentence will be influenced by factors such as the value and nature of the stolen goods and your perceived role in the operation.

Protect Your Future with an Expert Defence

An accusation of handling stolen goods poses a serious threat to your liberty and reputation. The evidence can appear stacked against you, but it can be challenged. A proactive, specialist defence is essential to protect your future.

Do not face this challenge alone. Contact our expert criminal defence solicitors immediately for a confidential consultation and take the first critical step in building your defence.

‍