No Comment Interviews: Pros and Cons

When facing a police interview, one of the most critical decisions you will make is whether to answer questions or to remain silent. A "no comment" interview is a formal exercise of your right to silence. While it may seem like a straightforward option, the decision has significant legal consequences that can dramatically affect the outcome of your case. Understanding the pros and cons of this approach is essential, and making the right choice is impossible without expert legal advice.

At Central Chambers Law, our senior legal consultants are experts in police station representation and criminal defence strategy. We deal with these critical tactical decisions every day. Our function is to provide you with a clear, authoritative assessment based on the evidence, allowing you to navigate the police interview process safely and effectively. We are specialists committed to protecting your legal rights and securing the best possible position for your defence from the very beginning.

What is a "No Comment" Interview?

A "no comment" interview is a formal police interview where the suspect exercises their right to silence by responding "no comment" to all or most of the questions asked by the investigating officers. This right is fundamental in UK law, but it is not absolute and its use has complex implications.

The right to silence is enshrined in law and is confirmed by the police caution read to you before any questioning: "You do not have to say anything. But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in Court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence." This warning highlights the central dilemma: the balance between the right to remain silent and the risk that your silence could be used against you later.

The Potential Benefits of a "No Comment" Interview

Deciding to say "no comment" is a strategic legal decision, not an admission of guilt. Advised correctly, it can be a powerful defensive tool.

The primary advantages include:

• Avoiding Self-Incrimination: The police interview is designed to gather evidence to support a prosecution. By remaining silent, you prevent the risk of misspeaking under pressure, getting confused, or inadvertently providing information that strengthens the police case against you.
• Limiting the Prosecution's Evidence: A "no comment" interview gives the prosecution very little material to work with. There are no admissions, no conflicting statements, and no speculative answers that they can use to attack your credibility in court. You force the prosecution to build their case solely on the other evidence they have managed to gather.
• Time to Assess the Case: Often, the police do not provide full disclosure of the evidence they hold before an interview. Remaining silent prevents you from being ambushed by evidence you haven't seen. It allows your solicitor to assess the strength of the police case before committing you to a specific account.
• Protection for Vulnerable Suspects: If a suspect is mentally distressed, unwell, intoxicated, or otherwise vulnerable, a "no comment" interview provides essential protection from being unfairly questioned while they are not in a fit state to answer.

The Significant Risks of a "No Comment" Interview

The primary risk of a "no comment" interview is clearly stated in the police caution: the court may draw an "adverse inference" from your silence.

Under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, if you fail to mention a fact during your interview which you later rely on for your defence in court, a judge or jury may draw the conclusion that you fabricated that fact after the interview. This can seriously damage your credibility and weaken your defence.

The risks include:

• Damaged Credibility: A jury might wonder why you did not provide your explanation to the police at the first opportunity if it was true. The prosecution will encourage them to believe that your silence was an attempt to hide your guilt.
• Loss of an Early Defence: By remaining silent, you miss the chance to put forward your side of the story at the earliest stage. In some cases, a clear and credible explanation in interview can lead to the police taking no further action, ending the investigation there and then.
• Negative Impression: While it is your right, a blanket "no comment" approach can sometimes be perceived negatively by investigators and, later, a jury, who may see it as uncooperative.

Why Central Chambers Law Provides the Definitive Guidance

The decision to answer questions or remain silent is one of the most important tactical choices in any criminal case. It is a nuanced judgment that should never be made without expert legal advice based on the specific circumstances of your case.

Clients trust Central Chambers Law because we are experts in criminal defence strategy. Our reputation is built upon our ability to make the correct tactical calls under pressure at the police station. Our role is clear and decisive:

• Demanding Pre-Interview Disclosure: We insist on receiving as much information as possible from the police about their case against you before you are interviewed. We do not let our clients be questioned "blind."
• Expert Analysis of the Evidence: We assess the strength and weakness of the police evidence. This analysis informs our recommendation on whether a "no comment" interview is the safest and most advantageous approach.
• Clear and Strategic Advice: We will explain the pros and cons to you in plain language. If we advise you to say "no comment," we will have a clear legal reason for doing so, such as insufficient evidence disclosed by the police. This reason can be put before the court later to rebut any suggestion of an adverse inference. If we advise you to answer, we will prepare you thoroughly.
• Active Defence in the Interview: During the interview, we ensure all procedures are followed correctly. If we have advised "no comment," we ensure you stick to that strategy. If we have advised you to answer, we intervene to stop unfair questioning and ensure your account is put accurately.

Our focused expertise means we provide the robust, intelligent guidance needed to navigate this critical stage and protect your legal position.

Make the Right Decision with an Expert by Your Side

The police interview is not a conversation; it is a critical evidence-gathering procedure. Whether you answer questions or exercise your right to silence will set the course for your entire case. Making the wrong choice can be catastrophic.

Never attend a police interview without an expert solicitor. If you have been arrested or invited for a voluntary interview, contact our expert criminal defence solicitors immediately. Your decision on how to approach the interview requires specialist advice.

‍