Central Chambers Law
Shareholder Disputes & Unfair Prejudice Petitions

While shareholders invest in a company with a shared vision for success, disagreements are an inevitable part of business. When these conflicts escalate, they can lead to serious shareholder disputes that paralyse decision-making, destroy company value, and create deep-seated acrimony. For minority shareholders, there is an added risk of being unfairly treated by those in control. Navigating these disputes requires a firm grasp of company law and a robust strategy to protect your rights and your investment.
At Central Chambers Law, our senior legal consultants are experts in corporate governance and shareholder litigation. We understand the complex interplay of legal duties, commercial realities, and personal relationships that define these disputes. Our function is to provide clear, authoritative advice and to execute a powerful legal strategy, whether you are a shareholder whose rights have been infringed or a director facing allegations of unfair conduct.
Common Causes of Shareholder Disputes
Disputes between shareholders can erupt for numerous reasons, but they often centre on a breakdown of trust or a belief that the company is being run for the benefit of some shareholders at the expense of others.
Common causes include:
- Disagreements over Dividends: Conflicts over the company's dividend policy, such as the majority refusing to declare dividends and instead retaining profits or paying themselves excessive salaries.
- Exclusion from Management: A minority shareholder who was previously involved in management being removed from their role or excluded from key decisions without good reason.
- Mismanagement of the Company: Concerns that the directors are running the business poorly, negligently, or for their own personal benefit, thereby reducing the value of the company.
- Breach of a Shareholders' Agreement: Failure by one or more shareholders to comply with the terms of a shareholders' agreement, which sets out the rules governing their relationship.
- Diversion of Business Opportunities: Directors or majority shareholders funnelling profitable opportunities to other businesses they own, in breach of their duties to the company.
The Legal Framework: Unfair Prejudice Petitions
The primary legal tool for an oppressed minority shareholder is an "unfair prejudice petition" under Section 994 of the Companies Act 2006.
A shareholder can bring a petition to the court if they can show two things:
- The company's affairs are being or have been conducted in a manner that is unfairly prejudicial to the interests of the members generally or some part of the members (including the petitioner).
- An actual or proposed act or omission of the company is or would be so prejudicial.
"Unfair prejudice" is a flexible concept. It means the court will look beyond the strict legal rights of the parties and consider whether, in fairness, the conduct is damaging the shareholder's investment or breaching legitimate expectations about how the company would be run.
Resolving Shareholder Disputes: A Strategic Approach
The goal is to find a resolution that protects your financial interests and provides a clean break where necessary. Litigation is a powerful tool but should be the final step in a carefully planned strategy.
- Review of Key Documents: The first step is a forensic review of the company's articles of association, any shareholders' agreement, and relevant board minutes or correspondence.
- Strategic Negotiation: A direct approach, backed by a strong legal analysis of your position, can often lead to a commercial settlement without the need for court proceedings.
- Mediation: A neutral third-party mediator can facilitate discussions and help the parties find a mutually agreeable solution, such as a share buyout on agreed terms. This is often faster and less costly than litigation.
- Issuing an Unfair Prejudice Petition: If negotiation and mediation fail, the aggrieved shareholder can issue a petition at court. This starts a formal legal process that will ultimately lead to a judge deciding the outcome.
Remedies the Court Can Grant
If an unfair prejudice petition is successful, the court has very wide powers to make any order it thinks fit to remedy the situation. The most common remedy is an order for the majority shareholders (or the company) to purchase the petitioner's shares at a fair value, determined by the court.
Other potential remedies include:
- An order regulating the future conduct of the company's affairs.
- An injunction to prevent the company or directors from taking a certain action.
- Authorising civil proceedings to be brought in the name of the company (a derivative claim).
- An order for damages or compensation to be paid.
Why Central Chambers Law Provides the Definitive Representation
Shareholder disputes are legally complex and commercially sensitive, requiring a legal team that is both technically expert and strategically astute.
Clients trust Central Chambers Law because we provide a sophisticated, discreet, and tenacious service designed for high-stakes corporate disputes. Our reputation is built on our ability to master the intricacies of company law and achieve our clients' commercial objectives. Our approach involves:
- Immediate, Authoritative Advice: We deliver an early, clear assessment of your legal position, outlining the strengths of your case and the most effective strategy for achieving a successful outcome.
- Deep Expertise in the Companies Act: Our team possesses an intrinsic, technical understanding of Section 994 petitions and the case law that governs them. We know what it takes to build a winning case.
- Commercially Focused Strategy: We understand that the ultimate goal is to protect your investment. Our advice is always geared towards achieving the best financial result, whether through a negotiated buyout or a court-ordered purchase.
- Powerful Advocacy: Our senior advocates are formidable litigators with the experience and authority to represent your interests forcefully in court, fighting to secure a fair valuation for your shares and a just outcome.
Our focused expertise means we are perfectly equipped to provide the intelligent and robust representation needed to navigate the challenges of a shareholder dispute.
Protect Your Investment with Immediate Expert Advice
If you are a shareholder who believes your rights are being ignored or that the company is being run in a manner that is unfairly prejudicial to your interests, you must seek specialist advice without delay. Your investment is at risk, and taking prompt action is critical.
Contact our expert company law solicitors immediately for an urgent and confidential consultation. Taking decisive action is the first step towards protecting your rights and achieving a fair resolution.