Theft

An accusation of theft, while common, is a serious criminal offence that can lead to a prison sentence and a criminal record. A conviction can create significant obstacles in your life, affecting your employment prospects, ability to secure insurance, and freedom to travel. The law surrounding theft is nuanced, often turning on the complex issues of dishonesty and intention. Defending against such a charge requires a legal team with the expertise to meticulously analyse the evidence and challenge the prosecution's interpretation of your actions.

At Central Chambers Law, our senior legal consultants are experts in defending against all theft-related allegations. We understand that these charges can arise from a simple mistake, a misunderstanding, or a momentary lapse in judgment. Our function is to provide a robust, strategic defence that examines every detail of the case. We are not general criminal lawyers; we are specialists who handle these specific cases daily, giving us an unrivalled understanding of how to protect our clients' reputations and futures.

Understanding the Offence: What is Theft?

The offence of theft is defined by Section 1 of the Theft Act 1968. It states that a person is guilty of theft if they dishonestly appropriate property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it.

To secure a conviction, the prosecution must prove every one of the following five elements:

1. Appropriation: You assumed the rights of the owner over the property. This can be as simple as taking it, but also includes actions like selling it or destroying it.
2. Property: The item must be considered property, which includes money and all other property, real or personal, including things in action and other intangible property.
3. Belonging to Another: The property must have belonged to someone else at the time of the appropriation.
4. Dishonesty: This is a key element. Your actions must be considered dishonest by the standards of ordinary, reasonable, and honest people.
5. Intention to Permanently Deprive: You must have intended for the original owner to lose the property forever. Borrowing an item, even without permission, is not theft if you always intended to return it.

How the Prosecution Builds a Case

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) will build its case by presenting evidence to satisfy each of the five legal elements of theft. The focus is often on proving your dishonesty and your intention.

Common evidence in theft cases includes:

• CCTV Footage: Video evidence from shops, businesses, or public spaces showing you taking the item is often the primary evidence in cases like shoplifting.
• Witness Testimony: Statements from eyewitnesses, such as store security guards or members of the public, who claim to have seen you commit the act.
• Possession of the Goods: Being found with the property shortly after it was taken is strong circumstantial evidence.
• Admissions in Interview: Anything you say to the police can be used as evidence. It is crucial to have expert legal advice before being interviewed.
• Lack of a Credible Explanation: If you cannot provide a reasonable, innocent explanation for possessing the property, this can be used against you.

Why Central Chambers Law Provides the Strongest Defence

When facing a theft charge, the quality of your legal representation is critical. The case often depends on subtle legal arguments about your state of mind, which a general criminal lawyer may not have the focused experience to advance effectively.

Clients trust Central Chambers Law because we are masters of this legal field. Our reputation is built on our ability to meticulously dismantle the prosecution's arguments. Our strategic approach involves:

• Challenging 'Dishonesty': This is often the central point of the defence. We build a robust case to demonstrate that you did not act dishonestly. For example, did you genuinely believe you had a right to the property, or that the owner would have consented if they knew?
• Disputing 'Intention to Permanently Deprive': We rigorously challenge the evidence to show you never intended for the owner to lose their property forever. Proving you intended to return the item is a complete defence.
• Contesting the Evidence: We scrutinise all evidence presented by the prosecution. Is the CCTV footage clear? Is the witness identification reliable? Are there procedural errors in the police investigation? We expose every weakness.
• Presenting Your Side of the Story: We ensure the court understands the full context of your situation. A simple mistake or a moment of confusion should not lead to a life-altering criminal conviction.

Our focused expertise means we are equipped to identify the arguments and challenge the evidence in a way that provides you with the most formidable defence possible.

Penalties and the Legal Process

Theft is an "either way" offence, meaning it can be dealt with in either the Magistrates' Court or the Crown Court, depending on the value of the goods and the specifics of the case.

• The maximum sentence for theft in the Crown Court is 7 years' imprisonment.

The sentence will depend on many factors, including the value of the property stolen, any breach of trust (e.g., stealing from an employer), and whether it was a planned or opportunistic act. While low-value shoplifting might result in a fine or community order, a high-value theft can lead to a significant custodial sentence.

Protect Your Future with an Expert Defence

An accusation of theft can have a serious impact on your life and reputation. The evidence might seem straightforward, but it can be challenged by a specialist legal team. A proactive, expert defence is essential to protect your future.

Do not face this challenge alone. Contact our expert criminal defence solicitors immediately for a confidential consultation and take the first critical step in building your defence.

‍