Warranty and Indemnity Claims

Warranties and indemnities are fundamental tools in commercial contracts, particularly in high-value transactions like business sales and mergers. They are designed to allocate risk between the parties, providing a crucial safety net if things do not turn out as expected. When a dispute arises over a warranty or indemnity, the financial stakes can be enormous. Navigating these claims requires a precise understanding of complex contract law and a clear-sighted commercial strategy, whether you are bringing a claim or defending against one.

At Central Chambers Law, our senior legal consultants are experts in resolving complex corporate and commercial disputes. We understand the critical distinctions between warranties and indemnities and the strategic approach required to litigate these claims successfully. Our function is to provide authoritative legal advice and to build a formidable case designed to protect your financial position and enforce your contractual rights.

Warranties and Indemnities: What's the Difference?

While both are used to provide a buyer with protection and a potential remedy, warranties and indemnities operate in very different ways. Understanding the distinction is the first step in any dispute.

What is a Warranty?

A warranty is a contractual statement of fact about a particular state of affairs, made by one party to another. For example, in a business sale, a seller might warrant that the company has no outstanding litigation or that its accounts are accurate. If this statement turns out to be untrue, the buyer may have a claim for breach of warranty.

A claim for breach of warranty is essentially a claim for breach of contract. The claimant must prove that the warranty was false and that they have suffered a loss as a result.

What is an Indemnity?

An indemnity is a contractual promise to reimburse another party for a specific type of loss they might suffer in the future. It creates a standalone obligation to pay, triggered by a specific event. For instance, a seller might indemnify a buyer against any costs arising from a known, ongoing tax investigation.

If the specified event occurs, the indemnifying party must cover the resulting loss. The claim is for a specified debt, not for damages resulting from a breach.

Key Differences in Practice

The legal differences between the two have significant practical consequences for any claim.

• Basis of Claim: A warranty claim is for breach of contract (damages). An indemnity claim is for a contractually agreed debt.
• Calculating Loss: For a breach of warranty, the claimant must prove their loss, which is typically the difference between the actual value of the asset and what its value would have been if the warranty were true. For an indemnity, the loss is usually calculated on a pound-for-pound basis as specified in the contract.
• Duty to Mitigate: In a warranty claim, the claimant has a legal duty to take reasonable steps to mitigate their losses. This duty does not generally apply to an indemnity claim.
• Disclosure: A seller can defend a warranty claim by showing that the breach was formally disclosed to the buyer before the contract was signed. Disclosures do not typically defeat an indemnity claim, which is designed to cover a known risk.

Pursuing or Defending a Claim

The process for managing a warranty or indemnity claim is often strictly governed by the terms of the contract itself. These agreements usually contain detailed notification clauses that set out tight deadlines and specific procedures for making a claim. Failure to follow these procedures precisely can result in the claim being lost.

The steps typically involve:

1. Formal Notification: The claimant must provide a detailed written notice of the claim to the other party, strictly adhering to the contractual requirements.
2. Investigation and Evidence: Both parties will gather evidence to support their position. This may involve forensic accountants, industry experts, and detailed disclosure of documents.
3. Negotiation and Settlement: The parties will often attempt to negotiate a commercial settlement to avoid the cost and uncertainty of litigation.
4. Litigation: If a settlement cannot be reached, the claimant will issue court proceedings to have a judge determine the outcome of the dispute.

Why Central Chambers Law Provides the Definitive Representation

Successfully litigating a warranty or indemnity claim demands a legal team that combines forensic attention to contractual detail with sharp commercial acumen and formidable litigation skills.

Clients trust Central Chambers Law because we provide a strategic, commercially focused, and tenacious service for these high-stakes disputes. Our reputation is built on our ability to master the complex facts and legal principles that decide these cases. Our approach involves:

• Immediate, Authoritative Advice: We provide an early and clear assessment of the contractual provisions, the merits of the claim, and the most effective strategy for achieving your objectives.
• Meticulous Procedural Management: We have an expert understanding of the notification and procedural requirements in these claims, ensuring your rights are protected and that no critical deadlines are missed.
• Forensic Case Preparation: We work relentlessly, often alongside leading forensic accountants, to analyse the evidence, quantify the loss, and build a powerful, irrefutable case.
• Powerful Negotiation and Advocacy: Our senior advocates are skilled negotiators and formidable trial lawyers. We have the experience and authority to represent your interests effectively, whether in settlement discussions or in the High Court.

Our focused expertise means we are perfectly equipped to provide the intelligent and robust representation needed to navigate these complex contractual claims and secure your financial interests.

Protect Your Position with Immediate Expert Advice

If you believe you have grounds for a warranty or indemnity claim, or if a claim has been made against you, you must act immediately. The contractual time limits are often very strict, and a failure to act can be fatal to your position.

Contact our expert commercial litigation solicitors immediately for an urgent and confidential consultation. Taking swift and precise action is the first and most critical step towards a successful outcome.

‍