Skip to Content
Enter
Skip to Menu
Enter
Skip to Footer
Enter
Request a Free Consultation

Central Chambers Law

Custodial Sentence for Theft & Disorder

case summary

All details are accurate to the date of publishing case files

Charges

Burglary Dwelling, Theft, Failure to Provide Sample

Statute

Theft Act 1968

Outcome

Sentenced to 15 Months Custody

Case Details

Primary Practice Area:
Criminal Law
Secondary Practice Area:
Burglary & Theft
Court Name:
Birmingham Crown Court

Charges

The defendant faced a multi-count indictment arising from a domestic incident within a shared property:

Count 1: Burglary Dwelling (Alleged trespass and theft).Count 2: Theft (Stealing a Bluetooth speaker).Additional Matters: Failure to provide a mandatory sample for drug testing (Class A trigger offence) and public order considerations regarding conduct towards arresting officers.

Situation

Police were called to a multi-occupancy house by a resident who reported that the defendant—a housemate—had entered their room, stolen a Bluetooth speaker, and made threats involving a knife.

Although the item was returned, the situation escalated upon the arrival of the police. The defendant became aggressive, directing numerous homophobic slurs at the officers and citing religious beliefs as justification for his non-compliance. Following his arrest, he further refused to provide a sample for a mandatory drug test at the station, stating he would "rather be charged" than comply.

Defence Strategy

Plea Strategy & Mitigation

The defence faced significant challenges due to the defendant's conduct at the scene and in custody. The legal strategy involved a careful separation of the charges.

The defendant entered a Guilty plea to the Theft of the speaker (Count 2). However, we advised a Not Guilty plea to the Burglary (Count 1) on the technical basis of the living arrangements within the HMO (House of Multiple Occupation). The focus of the representation was to mitigate the sentence by contextualising the dispute between the housemates, despite the aggravating factors of the homophobic abuse and the refusal to provide a sample.

quote marks
The defence focused on disentangling the complex domestic context of the multi-occupancy dwelling from the criminal allegations.

Outcome

Sentencing

The matter concluded at Birmingham Crown Court. Taking into account the guilty plea for theft, the aggressive conduct towards officers, and the failure to comply with station procedures, the Court imposed a total custodial sentence of 15 months.

While an immediate custodial term was unavoidable given the aggravating features (hate speech/homophobic slurs and knife threats), the sentence reflects the Court's assessment of the totality of the offending behaviour.

Facing charges?
Schedule a free consultation with someone in our crime team today. The sooner you start the process, the sooner we can try to help you to a solution.

Case Details

Practice Area
Criminal Law
Specific Charges
Burglary & Theft
Case Reference
R v Ah
Court
Birmingham Crown Court

Defence Lead

Lead Solicitor Not Disclosed

Legal Team

Legal Team Not Disclosed

External Counsel

Francesca Perera (Barrister)
External Counsel Not Disclosed
Ash Ahmed (ASL Solicitors)
External Counsel Not Disclosed

You Don't Have to Face This Alone

Contact us today for a free consultation, and to see how we might be able to support you.