Case Details
Charges
The defendant faced a multi-count indictment arising from a domestic incident within a shared property:
Count 1: Burglary Dwelling (Alleged trespass and theft).Count 2: Theft (Stealing a Bluetooth speaker).Additional Matters: Failure to provide a mandatory sample for drug testing (Class A trigger offence) and public order considerations regarding conduct towards arresting officers.
Situation
Police were called to a multi-occupancy house by a resident who reported that the defendant—a housemate—had entered their room, stolen a Bluetooth speaker, and made threats involving a knife.
Although the item was returned, the situation escalated upon the arrival of the police. The defendant became aggressive, directing numerous homophobic slurs at the officers and citing religious beliefs as justification for his non-compliance. Following his arrest, he further refused to provide a sample for a mandatory drug test at the station, stating he would "rather be charged" than comply.
Defence Strategy
Plea Strategy & Mitigation
The defence faced significant challenges due to the defendant's conduct at the scene and in custody. The legal strategy involved a careful separation of the charges.
The defendant entered a Guilty plea to the Theft of the speaker (Count 2). However, we advised a Not Guilty plea to the Burglary (Count 1) on the technical basis of the living arrangements within the HMO (House of Multiple Occupation). The focus of the representation was to mitigate the sentence by contextualising the dispute between the housemates, despite the aggravating factors of the homophobic abuse and the refusal to provide a sample.

Outcome
Sentencing
The matter concluded at Birmingham Crown Court. Taking into account the guilty plea for theft, the aggressive conduct towards officers, and the failure to comply with station procedures, the Court imposed a total custodial sentence of 15 months.
While an immediate custodial term was unavoidable given the aggravating features (hate speech/homophobic slurs and knife threats), the sentence reflects the Court's assessment of the totality of the offending behaviour.

