Skip to Content
Enter
Skip to Menu
Enter
Skip to Footer
Enter
Request a Free Consultation

Central Chambers Law

Case Result: Sentencing for Class A Supply (Street Dealing)

case summary

All details are accurate to the date of publishing case files

Charges

PWITS Class A (Heroin & Crack Cocaine)

Statute

Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

Outcome

Sentenced to 68 Months Custody

Case Details

Primary Practice Area:
Criminal Law
Secondary Practice Area:
Drug Offences
Court Name:
Shrewsbury Crown Court

Charges

The defendant faced a serious indictment for street-level dealing of Class A substances:

Count 1: Possession with Intent to Supply a Controlled Drug of Class A (Crack Cocaine).Count 2: Possession with Intent to Supply a Controlled Drug of Class A (Diamorphine/Heroin).

These offences carry a starting point of significant custody under the Sentencing Guidelines, particularly when "street dealing" paraphernalia is present.

Situation

Police officers arrested the defendant in a local park following observations of suspected drug transactions with known users.

Upon stopping the defendant, officers seized a paper bag containing multiple "snap seal" bags distinguished by a green cannabis leaf print. These bags contained brown powder and white rocks. Further searches revealed cash, two Nokia "burner" phones, and a damaged iPhone. Forensic analysis confirmed the substances were Crack Cocaine, Heroin, and Cannabis, and fingerprint analysis linked the packaging to the defendant.

Defence Strategy

Negotiating the Basis of Plea

Initially, the defendant entered a Not Guilty plea. However, faced with the forensic evidence, the legal strategy shifted to mitigation.

We advised the client to enter a Guilty plea on a specific written basis. We presented evidence that the defendant had suffered a significant trauma—the death of his half-brother—which led to an addiction spiral. The defence argued that the dealing was not a commercial enterprise for profit, but a desperate measure to pay off a drug debt enforced by threats of violence from his suppliers. This "debt bondage" argument was crucial for the sentencing exercise.

quote marks
We successfully advanced a 'Basis of Plea' proving the defendant was acting under the pressure of a drug debt, rather than for sole financial gain.

Outcome

Sentencing Outcome

On 28 January 2025, the case concluded at Shrewsbury Crown Court. The Judge accepted the guilty pleas and sentenced the defendant to a total custodial period of 68 months (5 years and 8 months).

While a custodial sentence was inevitable for Class A supply, the submission of the Basis of Plea ensured the Court considered the coercive circumstances behind the offending.

Facing charges?
Schedule a free consultation with someone in our crime team today. The sooner you start the process, the sooner we can try to help you to a solution.

Case Details

Practice Area
Criminal Law
Specific Charges
Drug Offences
Case Reference
R v Ah
Court
Shrewsbury Crown Court

Defence Lead

Lead Solicitor Not Disclosed

Legal Team

Legal Team Not Disclosed

External Counsel

Citadel Chambers, Equity Chambers
External Counsel Not Disclosed
Citadel Chambers / Equity Chambers
External Counsel Not Disclosed

You Don't Have to Face This Alone

Contact us today for a free consultation, and to see how we might be able to support you.