R v Bv

This case concerned a drug supply operation in North Manchester. The defendant was charged with six offences involving the supply of Class A and B drugs and possession of criminal property. The investigation relied principally on telecommunication data linking the defendant to daily bulk messaging and drug advertisements. The defence represented the client at Manchester Crown Square Crown Court, where he pleaded guilty to all counts and was sentenced to 4 years and 6 months’ imprisonment.

The investigation focused on a drug line operating in North Manchester, responsible for supplying Class A drugs including heroin and crack cocaine. Police collected substantial evidence, with telecommunications data forming a central part of the prosecution case. Bulk messages advertising drugs were sent daily, connecting the defendant to the supply network.

In response to the evidence, the defendant was advised on his legal position and admitted involvement in the supply of controlled drugs. The case illustrates the use of digital evidence in dismantling drug operations and prosecuting supply offences.

The defendant pleaded guilty to the following six counts:

• Being Concerned in Supplying a Controlled Drug of Class A to Another (Heroin)
• Being Concerned in Supplying a Controlled Drug of Class A to Another (Crack Cocaine)
• Possessing a Controlled Drug of Class A with Intent (Heroin)
• Possessing a Controlled Drug of Class A with Intent (Cocaine)
• Possessing a Controlled Drug of Class B (Cannabis)
• Possessing Criminal Property (Cash)

All charges were admitted by the defendant and accepted by the prosecution.

The defence team, led by solicitor Fosia Jury, represented the defendant throughout the proceedings. The team analysed the extensive telecommunication evidence and advised the client on the likely outcome of pleading guilty. Following legal advice, the defendant entered guilty pleas to all counts.

The focus then shifted to preparing mitigation ahead of sentencing. Experienced counsel from Libertas Chambers was instructed to present the defendant’s personal circumstances to the court, ensuring relevant factors were considered at the sentencing hearing.