Skip to Content
Enter
Skip to Menu
Enter
Skip to Footer
Enter
Request a Free Consultation

Central Chambers Law

Active Defence: Wounding with Intent & Self-Defence

case summary

All details are accurate to the date of publishing case files

Charges

s.18 Wounding with Intent, s.20 Wounding, Theft, Offensive Weapon

Statute

Offences against the Person Act 1861 / Theft Act 1968

Outcome

Active Case: Contesting Charges

Case Details

Primary Practice Area:
Criminal Law
Secondary Practice Area:
Violent Crime
Court Name:
Birmingham Crown Court

Charges

The defendant faces a four-count indictment following an altercation near his home:

Count 1: Unlawfully and maliciously wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm (Section 18).

Count 2: Unlawful wounding (Section 20).* Count 3: Theft (Stealing £60 cash).* Count 4: Possession of an Offensive Weapon in a public place (Keys).

The inclusion of the Section 18 charge indicates the prosecution believes there was a specific intent to cause serious injury, allegedly involving the use of a weapon.

Situation

The incident occurred while the victim and a witness were returning home to a shared-house accommodation where the defendant also resided. The prosecution alleges that the defendant ran across the road with a "silver object" in his hand, swinging punches and connecting with the victim under the right eye.

The blow caused a 3cm laceration, and the victim fell to the floor, allegedly dropping belongings including £60 in cash, which the Crown claims the defendant stole. Police later recovered a dog chain from outside the defendant's address, which investigators believe may have been wrapped around the hand of the defendant during the assault.

Defence Strategy

Current Strategy: Self-Defence

The defendant has entered a Not Guilty plea (implied by the defence statement content). In his Defence Statement, he categorically denies initiating the physical altercation.

Our legal strategy focuses on Self-Defence. The defendant asserts that his actions were a lawful response to threatening behaviour from the complainant. We are also vigorously disputing the allegation that a weapon (keys or dog chain) was used and denying the theft of the cash. The defence case is that this was a responsive act in a volatile neighbour dispute, not a predatory attack.

quote marks
The central issue is self-defence. We are contesting the prosecution's narrative that our client was the aggressor in this neighbour dispute.

Outcome

Status: Active Proceedings

The case is currently proceeding through the Birmingham Crown Court. The defence team is preparing to present the client's account of self-defence at trial.

Note: As this is an active matter, specific details regarding the trial date and further evidence remain confidential.

Facing charges?
Schedule a free consultation with someone in our crime team today. The sooner you start the process, the sooner we can try to help you to a solution.

Case Details

Practice Area
Criminal Law
Specific Charges
Violent Crime
Case Reference
R v Dw
Court
Birmingham Crown Court

Defence Lead

Lead Solicitor Not Disclosed

Legal Team

Legal Team Not Disclosed

External Counsel

External Counsel Not Disclosed
External Counsel Not Disclosed

You Don't Have to Face This Alone

Contact us today for a free consultation, and to see how we might be able to support you.