Skip to Content
Enter
Skip to Menu
Enter
Skip to Footer
Enter
Request a Free Consultation

Central Chambers Law

Active Defence: County Lines & Bulk Communications Evidence

case summary

All details are accurate to the date of publishing case files

Charges

Being Concerned in Supply Class A (Heroin/Crack)

Statute

Misuse of Drugs Act 1971

Outcome

Active Case: Awaiting Sentence

Case Details

Primary Practice Area:
Criminal Law
Secondary Practice Area:
Drug Offences
Court Name:
Birmingham Crown Court

Charges

The defendant faces a four-count indictment relating to the supply of Class A drugs:

Counts 1 & 2: Being Concerned in the Supply of Class A (Crack Cocaine). Counts 3 & 4: Being Concerned in the Supply of Class A (Heroin).

The charges stem from a major investigation into a "County Lines" network, where the prosecution alleges the defendant played a central role in distributing narcotics.

Situation

Police arrested the defendant alongside two co-defendants following an intelligence-led operation. The investigation uncovered a massive volume of telecommunications data, specifically 98,000 bulk messages sent out to drug users.

The prosecution case is that these messages demonstrate the operation of a dedicated drugs line. Officers also seized a significant quantity of Class A drugs and cash during the arrests. The Crown asserts that the defendant was directly "concerned in" the supply chain, facilitating the movement of drugs and money.

Defence Strategy

Current Strategy: Challenging Involvement

The defendant entered a Not Guilty plea to the indictment. His defence is that while he was aware an associate was involved in the supply of Class A drugs, he himself was not a participant.

The legal battle focuses on the interpretation of the communications data. We are arguing that mere association or knowledge of the operation does not constitute "being concerned" in the supply. The defence maintains that the defendant did not assist, direct, or profit from the enterprise, despite the proximity to the main offenders.

quote marks
The prosecution relies on 98,000 communication events to allege a leadership role. We are contesting the attribution of these messages to our client.

Outcome

Status: Awaiting Sentence

Following the trial process, the defendant is now awaiting sentencing at Birmingham Crown Court, with a mention hearing listed for 21 April 2025.

Note: As legal proceedings are still active regarding the final disposition, further details remain confidential.

Facing charges?
Schedule a free consultation with someone in our crime team today. The sooner you start the process, the sooner we can try to help you to a solution.

Case Details

Practice Area
Criminal Law
Specific Charges
Drug Offences
Case Reference
R v Ib
Court
Birmingham Crown Court

Defence Lead

Lead Solicitor Not Disclosed

Legal Team

Legal Team Not Disclosed

External Counsel

External Counsel Not Disclosed
External Counsel Not Disclosed

You Don't Have to Face This Alone

Contact us today for a free consultation, and to see how we might be able to support you.