Skip to Content
Enter
Skip to Menu
Enter
Skip to Footer
Enter
Request a Free Consultation

Central Chambers Law

No Jail Time: Suspended Sentence for GBH & Theft

case summary

All details are accurate to the date of publishing case files

Charges

s.18 GBH (Intent), s.20 GBH, Theft

Statute

Offences against the Person Act 1861

Outcome

Sentenced to 16 Months Suspended

Case Details

Primary Practice Area:
Criminal Law
Secondary Practice Area:
Violent Crime
Court Name:
Birmingham Crown Court

Charges

The defendant faced a three-count indictment following allegations of a violent street robbery:

Count 1: Causing Grievous Bodily Harm with Intent (Section 18).

Count 2: Inflicting Grievous Bodily Harm (Section 20).Count 3: Theft (Stealing a bag, mobile phone, and headphones).

The primary charge (s.18) is the most severe form of assault short of attempted murder, requiring proof of specific intent to cause serious injury.

Situation

The victim was walking home along an alleyway when he was allegedly set upon by three individuals. He was pushed, punched, and kicked repeatedly, losing consciousness during the assault. Upon waking, he discovered his personal belongings had been stolen.

Police arrested the defendant along with two co-defendants. In his initial police interview, the defendant exercised his right to answer "No Comment." In his subsequent Defence Statement, he denied involvement, stating he was not part of the conflict and did not know the victim.

Defence Strategy

Trial Strategy: Challenging Identification & Intent

The defence entered Not Guilty pleas to all counts, forcing the Crown to prove its case at trial. Our strategy involved rigorously testing the identification evidence and the attribution of specific acts of violence to our client.

By challenging the prosecution's narrative of a pre-planned "joint enterprise" robbery, we aimed to undermine the s.18 charge (Intent). The goal was to demonstrate that even if presence could be proven, the specific intent to cause really serious harm was not established beyond reasonable doubt.

quote marks
The prosecution case alleged a joint-enterprise attack. By vigorously contesting the 'Intent' (s.18), we avoided a long-term prison sentence.

Outcome

Suspended Sentence Secured

Following legal arguments, the case concluded with a highly favourable sentencing outcome. The defendant was sentenced to 16 months imprisonment, suspended for 18 months.

This result means the client avoids immediate custody. Given the starting point for street robbery and group violence often exceeds 5 years, securing a suspended sentence represents a significant success for the defence team.

Facing charges?
Schedule a free consultation with someone in our crime team today. The sooner you start the process, the sooner we can try to help you to a solution.

Case Details

Practice Area
Criminal Law
Specific Charges
Violent Crime
Case Reference
R v Lg
Court
Birmingham Crown Court

Defence Lead

Lead Solicitor Not Disclosed

Legal Team

Legal Team Not Disclosed

External Counsel

St Philips Barristers
External Counsel Not Disclosed
External Counsel Not Disclosed

You Don't Have to Face This Alone

Contact us today for a free consultation, and to see how we might be able to support you.