The Renters’ Rights Act 2025
What the end of Section 21 means for landlords and tenants
The Renters’ Rights Act 2025 marks the most significant change to the private rented sector in England for a generation, with the Government describing the 1 May 2026 reforms as the most significant changes in nearly 40 years. Its most prominent reform is the abolition of Section 21 “no-fault” evictions, but the Act goes further and considers reforms to assured tenancies, possession grounds, and landlord redress, among other matters. The result is a new legal architecture for private renting.
From 1 May 2026, landlords seeking possession must generally identify and prove a statutory ground under Section 8 of the Housing Act 1988 to seek possession and use the new prescribed possession notice form.
From Section 21 to a grounds-based system
Under the previous Section 21 regime, a landlord could recover possession of an assured shorthold tenancy without having to prove fault by the tenant or any particular reason for wanting the property back. As a result, had the landlord served the correct notice and complied with the statutory requirements, possession would be granted.
From 1 May 2026, Section 21 no-fault evictions are abolished for the private rental sector, and all tenancies move to a periodic model rather than fixed-term tenancies.
This means that possession must be justified by reference to statutory grounds. To name a few, these include a genuine intention to sell, a landlord or family member’s intended occupation, arrears schedules, anti-social behaviour, inspection notes, etc.
The practical consequence is that landlords need a stronger evidential file before serving notice. Rent schedules should be accurate, communications should be preserved, and any disrepair allegations should be investigated properly.
TransitionalSection 21 notices
There is a transitional position for notices served before 1 May 2026. For a pre-1 May 2026 Section 21 notice, possession proceedings must be started by the earlier of the time remaining on the notice, or 31 July 2026. If the possession process is not started within this period, Section 21 will no longer be available, and the landlord must use the updated Section 8 grounds.
For landlords who served a Section 21 notice before commencement, the key question is therefore whether the notice is usable and whether proceedings have been issued in time.
Conclusion
The Renters’ Rights Act has fundamentally changed the underlying balance of the private rented sector by replacing the Section 21 exit route with a more evidence-based and regulated framework.
In essence, the post-Section 21 market is favourable to landlords who manage property professionally, document decisions carefully, and comply with their statutory obligations. The immediate task for landlords is to move from reaction to preparation. That means auditing existing tenancies, replacing old Section 21 templates, and ensuring that every decision capable of affecting a tenant is recorded with reasons.
Given the potential legal and practical consequences, it is important to obtain advice at an early stage. We regularly advise clients in this area and can help you assess your options and protect your position. Please call us to arrange a consultation.
Footnotes
[1] the time remaining on the notice,
<https://www.gov.uk/government/news/when-will-the-renters-right-act-come-into-force>.
[2] Notice 31, July 2026,
<https://www.gov.uk/guidance/assured-tenancy-forms>.
Legal disclaimer and restricted access
The content provided in this newsletter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Any person facing legal charges should seek immediate advice from a qualified solicitor or barrister.
Central Chambers Law does not accept liability for any decisions made on the basis of information contained in this article. Access to certain restricted legal templates and case materials requires explicit confirmation that you understand these limitations and accept full responsibility for your use of such materials.
FAQ
Some questions we get, which may help you in this moment
When you receive a Letter of Claim or a formal Claim Form, you are at a critical crossroads in a legal dispute. While they may look similar, they represent two different stages of litigation, and mishandling either can lead to unfavourable financial and legal consequences.
A Letter of Claim, also known as a Letter Before Action, is a formal warning that someone intends to start court proceedings against you. Under the Civil Procedure Rules, parties are expected to exchange enough information to understand each other’s positions and attempt to settle without involving the court.
Ignoring this letter is a high-risk strategy. Even if you believe the claim is meritless, the court can penalise you later by ordering you to pay the other side’s legal costs, because you failed to follow the required Pre-Action Protocols. This stage is actually a vital window of opportunity. It allows for strategic negotiations or Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), which can resolve the matter privately and more cost-effectively than litigation.
If you receive a Claim Form, on the other hand, the matter has officially entered the court system. This is more urgent than a preliminary letter. From the moment you are served (which is deemed to occur 2 business days after the documents were posted to your last known address) the countdown begins.
If you do not engage with a claim, the other side can request a default judgment 15 days after you are deemed to have received the Claim Form. Once this judgment is entered, it is a matter of public record that can significantly damage your credit rating for 6 years and allows the other side to take enforcement measures.
There are procedural steps available to protect you in such situations. For instance, filing an acknowledgement of service is a vital holding position and allows you more time to prepare a proper defence. Engaging with a solicitor at this moment is essential to identify potential flaws in the claim that can allow you to have the claim stopped or struck out.
A court judgment (often called a CCJ) is a serious matter that allows a creditor to take aggressive enforcement action, such as sending bailiffs to seize goods or freezing your bank accounts. However, there are solutions to put your mind at ease. The first priority is to determine if the judgment was entered correctly. If you were unaware of the original claim, perhaps due to documents being sent to a previous address, there are procedural mechanisms to apply to have the judgment set aside. This process effectively cancels the judgment and reopens the case, but the court will only grant this if you act quickly after discovering the order.
Immediate legal guidance is essential to ensure your application meets the court's strict requirements.
A judgment is a major indicator of financial risk that stays on your credit report for 6 years. During this time, it can prevent you from obtaining a mortgage, securing a loan, or even getting a mobile phone contract. Many private landlords and letting agents also check these records, meaning a judgment could even stop you from renting a home.
To minimise this damage, paying the debt in full more than 30 days after the order will mark the judgment as satisfied. While the entry remains for the full 6 years, a satisfied status shows future lenders that you have fulfilled your obligations.
Contractual breaches can range from minor failures to fundamental violations that render the entire agreement void. Before initiating a formal claim, the court expects parties to follow certain Pre-Action Protocols, which involve clear correspondence detailing the breach and the resulting loss. This structured approach often provides a solution to the dispute through negotiation or mediation, and helps parties avoid the costs of litigation.
If a claim becomes necessary, the objective is to secure damages that place you in the financial position you would have been had the contract been fulfilled. Depending on the nature of the breach, other remedies may be available, such as specific performance, where the court compels the other party to complete their original obligations, or an injunction to prevent further harm.
Recovering a debt requires a careful strategy to ensure the process remains cost-effective. We begin with formal demands that comply with court standards for debt claims. If the debtor remains unresponsive, obtaining a court judgment is the next step, which then unlocks a variety of enforcement tools to turn that judgment into actual payment.
Depending on the debtor’s assets, the legal solution may involve a Charging Order to secure the debt against their property, an Attachment of Earnings to deduct payments directly from their salary, or a Third-Party Debt Order to recover funds from their bank account. In cases where a debtor is a company, insolvency-based procedures like a Winding-Up Petition can also be considered as a powerful means of prompting payment.
A limitation period is a statutory deadline imposed by the Limitation Act 1980, typically giving you 6 years from the date of a breach or damage to issue a claim. Once this period expires, the claim is time-barred, and the other side will have an absolute defence to block your case, regardless of its merits.
Because these deadlines are non-negotiable, waiting too long can mean losing your right to justice entirely. We recommend a prompt review of any potential claim to ensure you meet all statutory time limits and protect your ability to recover your losses.
