Immigration crime prosecutions have surged as the UK tightens border controls and increases enforcement activities. What many consider administrative immigration matters can quickly become serious criminal charges carrying imprisonment and deportation. Understanding the intersection between immigration law and criminal law requires specialist expertise few firms possess.
The human cost of immigration prosecutions extends beyond individual defendants. Families are separated, asylum seekers criminalised, and vulnerable people exploited by smuggling networks face harsh sentences. Our approach combines robust criminal defence with understanding of immigration consequences, protecting both liberty and immigration status.
Illegal entry charges catch those who enter the UK without valid permission. Despite potentially fleeing persecution, asylum seekers can face prosecution for using false documents or entering irregularly. The tension between refugee protection and border enforcement creates complex legal challenges.
Overstaying becomes criminal in certain circumstances, particularly when combined with working illegally or using deception. What begins as administrative overstaying can escalate to criminal charges with serious consequences for future immigration applications.
Document fraud prosecutions affect both migrants and those assisting them. Using false passports, visa applications containing misrepresentations, or possessing false documents all constitute serious offences. The overlap with identity document fraud brings severe sentences.
Facilitating illegal entry ranges from commercial people smuggling to families helping relatives. The offence catches anyone assisting illegal entry, regardless of financial gain. Humanitarian defences exist but require careful presentation.
Asylum seekers face particular challenges when charged with immigration crimes. International law prohibits penalising refugees for illegal entry when coming directly from persecution. We argue these defences robustly, demonstrating why clients had no choice but to use false documents or enter illegally.
Modern slavery victims often face immigration charges despite being trafficking victims. We pursue modern slavery defences, working with support organisations to demonstrate exploitation. The National Referral Mechanism provides protection, but navigating these procedures during criminal proceedings requires expertise.
Sham marriage prosecutions involve complex investigations into relationship genuineness. Cultural differences in marriage practices, arranged marriages, and financial arrangements within relationships all complicate these cases. We challenge assumptions and demonstrate genuine relationships where they exist.
Immigration prosecutions often rely on circumstantial evidence and assumptions about defendants' knowledge and intent. We challenge these assumptions, demonstrating lack of knowledge about immigration status or document falsity where appropriate.
Deportation consequences make immigration crime convictions particularly serious. We structure defences to minimise immigration impacts, sometimes accepting lesser charges to avoid automatic deportation triggers. Understanding both criminal and immigration law allows holistic defence strategies.
Human rights arguments feature prominently in immigration crime defences. Article 8 family life rights, Article 3 prohibition on inhuman treatment, and refugee protection obligations all constrain prosecutions. We advance these arguments throughout proceedings.